Chris Powell's Flat Cap

Home » Opinion » Can’t Control Weather, Can Avoid Cutting Corners

Can’t Control Weather, Can Avoid Cutting Corners

In the three years of Roland Duchatelet’s ownership at Charlton Athletic, those connected to the regime have desperately attempted to promote relatively minor positives in the face of footballing failure, heavy general criticism, and supporter disconnection.

For example, the suggestion that, having been left in a precarious state by the previous regime, financial security has been achieved is constantly offered. Dubious, considering financial security has been achieved through Duchatelet loaning money to the club.

Then there’s the continued, if not enhanced, promotion of talented homegrown players. Tainted by the willingness to sell them, and the sense that they are effectively being produced for the benefit of other clubs.

And some may even attempt to claim that the occasional positive bit of recruitment, beyond the capabilities of previous regimes, has been made.  But for every Johann Berg Gudmundsson, there’s five Piotr Parzyszeks.

However, if there is one positive that the regime cling onto that, it seemed, couldn’t be questioned it’s the improvement of The Valley’s pitch. A transformation from disgraceful bog, following the collapse of a drainage system, to an immaculate playing surface brought into the 21st century. Not only has the turf consistently been in almost perfect condition since the summer of 2014, but an undersoil heating system was supposedly instilled.

So it no wonder that the postponement of Charlton’s home game against Scunthorpe United, with The Valley’s pitch frozen, has caused a considerable amount of discontent among supporters of the Addicks. Quite possibly the one unquestionable positive this regime has had on this club now with a question mark over it.

The pipes required for the undersoil heating system instilled, but not the heater required to get the undersoil heating system to function. Like wearing a coat without a hood in the rain. Not something that has been admitted to in the past.

Too costly, it would seem. Too costly to even hire some sort of heater as a temporary measure to make sure this game would go ahead. Too costly despite the £11m made from Ademola Lookman’s sale.

Something that Nathan Chapman, The Valley’s groundsman, was required to explain. Rather unfair considering this postponement, in part, is quite evidently a financial issue and there hasn’t been a suggestion that Chapman and his team didn’t do enough. Those with financial power, as ever, hiding away.

Of course, it impossible for any football club’s ownership to control the weather that their ground must contend with. We would not be aware about this issue were it not for the freezing conditions.

So too is there an argument that it’s not worth being angered, frustrated or embarrassed by Charlton’s failure to get this game on as it might well have benefited us. The need to play a fixture against difficult opponents with several key players absent avoided

And, in truth, I’m not displeased that the game was postponed. I had a very troubled morning, collapsing several times before ultimately having a seizure, so escaping the need to force myself to SE7 when clearly not in the state to do so has probably done me some good.

But that all beside the point. The point being that even in the most ‘celebrated’ impact this regime has had on the club, corners were cut. Even with the finances clearly available to utilise something as a temporary measure, those finances were not spent.

The pitch improvements, clung onto for 30 months, not totally as indicated, and mistakes evidently made in the build-up to this fixture. Only one other League One game postponed, and the majority of non-league fixtures in relatively close proximity to SE7 getting the go ahead. Embarrassing, really.

And that, in summary, is what this is. Another huge embarrassment for this regime, on top of the countless embarrassments they have already inflicted upon themselves. The pitch positive heavily tainted, if not lost, and the general failure to get the game on rather poor.

Ultimately, this another day where the lack of trust in this regime increases, and where the wider footballing public’s opinion of this club decreases further. All, as ever, avoidable.

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. Tony says:

    Get over yourself. I and my sea on ticket holder friends travelled from Manchester. This is not the first or last game to be cancelled because of weather
    Other clubs had similar problems.
    The attempt to use every common problem to bang the anti Duchalet drum is getting to become tedious.
    I’m no great fan of Duchalet but like it or not for the moment his money is keeping the show on the road and his investment has been more evident than some of the other former owners who did not seem to incur the same criticism from the Charlton Life fraternity and their acolytes.
    Always enjoy your match reports but don’t think the anti Duchalet sentiment is as widely supported as some think.
    A northern Addick

    • Kyle Andrews says:

      Equally tedious is the need to continue to identify mistakes or errors made by the club that could have so easily been avoided – there no pleasure to be had in discovering another mistake, another lie or whatever. In this case, we weren’t informed that undersoil heating wasn’t functional, and it could have been made functional in preparation for this weekend, not least with the recent fee received for Lookman. Granted, and as I’ve made clear, no one can control the weather. But more should have been done to prevent the weather from forcing a postponement.
      Numbers in seats, support of protests, general criticism and general feeling towards Duchatelet suggests otherwise with regards to the anti Duchatelet sentiment. And, given the continued mistakes, the position the club are in, the constant insults sent the way of supporters, and the alienation, disconnection and apathy felt among supporters, that he’s doing the absolute minimum an owner should do by keeping it afloat (and even that through a high interest loan) hardly matters. That Slater and Jimenez stopped investing, and leaving the pitch in its previous dire state, doesn’t make anything Duchatelet has done more acceptable.

      • Brian says:

        The one thing that Tony is overlooking that the only other games postponed were at smaller clubs without the money. We were the biggest club and the biggest stadium that failed to put the match on.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: